Filter Content
- A message from Brad, our President.
- Talk of Principals In Catholic Schools - TOPICS 2019 Poll Results!
- Self-care: the critical reason why school staff and leaders must prioritise their own wellbeing without feeling guilty
- Camp Australia
- What does it take to run a successful school?
- MSP
- SPOTLIGHT - VICTORIA
- 10 Principles for Schools of Modern Learning
- Preparing Students for the Future
- ACPPA SZapp Download WINNER!
- Switch Recruitment
- What’s good ‘evidence-based’ practice for classrooms?
- WOODS Furniture
- APPA National Conference 2019 - Register NOW by clicking this logo!
- PETAA
- Schools and surveillance: the facial recognition debate
- pixevety
- The Breakthrough Coach
- School Improvement: Being a new school leader
- Teachers Health
- ACPPA LINKS -Exclusive Offer!
- Hear and Learn
- The benefits of homework may not be immediately apparent
- Programmed Property Maintenance
- Just a thought!
Talk of Principals In Catholic Schools - TOPICS 2019 Poll Results!
Here's what you said...
I would like more about principal wellbeing - 31.11%
I would like school based stories from other principals - 24.44%
I would like information about international education - 6.67%
I would like more about Australian education issues - 32.22%
I am happy the way it is - 4.44%
We are working on that right now for you and this edition covers lots of these areas...happy reading!
Paul Colyer - Executive Officer
Phone: 0478973767
Email: paul.colyer@acppa.catholic.edu.au
What does it take to run a successful school?
Holy Spirit Primary School principal, Brad Gaynor, has been working in education for 29 years, but this has not made him feel jaded in his role.
Just last year, Gaynor awarded Primary School Principal of the Year – Non-Government at the inaugural Australian Education Awards in Sydney. Gaynor has led his school with a strong focus on “differentiated leadership”, which he says is based on one knowing their inner strengths and limitations.
This, says Gaynor, is an important focus to have in a job that has been shown to take a considerable toll on the health and wellbeing of Australia’s school leaders.
Last week, a damning new report into principal health and wellbeing revealed that one in three school leaders have been physically assaulted and that violent incidents jumped 10% over the last seven years.
The survey found almost half (45%) were threatened with violence in 2018, compared with 38% in 2011 and that 99.7% of principals work hours far beyond those recommended for positive mental and physical health.
‘It takes a team’
While encouraging work is being done by some state education departments to reduce principals’ workloads, Gaynor says that he expects government, system and parental expectations to grow, given that education is a complex profession.
“More and more has been asked of schools, of leaders and of teachers, especially in terms of administration, compliance and accountability,” he told The Educator.
“This has been well documented and debated within the profession and in the media. In terms of leadership, a principal simply cannot do all these things single handily, let alone our core business of teaching and learning.”
A part of meeting these expectations, said Gaynor, is being closely connected with the school’s entire community and leading as part of a unified structure rather than from the solitude of the principal’s office.
Indeed, Gaynor has always been acutely aware that running a successful school takes a team, noting that over the years he has been “gifted with many wonderful co-leaders and staff”.
“Together we have been able to plan, debate, implement, trial, learn from mistakes and refine programs and initiatives. By working and growing together, we have been able to achieve some great outcomes for the schools and, more importantly, for students,” he said.
“Being more reachable encourages students and staff to share their learning and to discuss any concerns they have. This builds that sense of community and positivity that is necessary to improve teaching and learning for all.”
A good life/work balance
Gaynor says one of the best aspects of being a principal is chatting with students, “to see them excited about what they are learning or to follow up on how their football or netball final went”.
“It’s about celebrating their achievements,” he said, adding that the same goes with staff.
“It is also about knowing them and supporting their wellbeing. Initially, the principal has to model positivity, self-regulate effectively, know good pedagogy and have the ability work with all staff,” he said.
In terms of wellbeing, Gaynor said that modelling “a good life/work balance” is essential.
“Note I have put life first because stating work first sends the wrong message. Work is a big part of life, but it should not be the only focus. Family, fitness and recreation are more important,” he explained.
“Life/work balance is not easy, but I try to have one early afternoon each week where I leave by 4pm to catch up with friends and I try not to email outside school hours or on weekends.”
Gaynor said a significant part of staff wellbeing is humour and having a social element to a staff.
“Sharing a laugh and a having a social get together builds community and gives an opportunity for everyone to check in and make sure colleagues are doing ok.”
Brad Gaynor - ACPPA President and Principal Holy Spirit Nicholls
Email: president@acppa.catholic.edu.au
Building schools we can all be proud of, the Victorian Catholic Primary Principal Association (VACPSP) celebrate principal leadership by supporting the Australian John Laing Awards.
Catholic primary principals in Victoria, as with all principals across Australia accept the daily challenge of supporting all students to flourish and thrive. In 2018 and 2017, a principal from a regional city (Geelong 2018), and three principals of small Catholic primary schools (Grampians Region of Western Victoria 2017) broke through their own glass ceilings of specific entrenched disadvantage to achieve substantial student learning outcomes.
The achievements of the schools, students and the community have been recognised and celebrated by the principal education community at the annual John Laing Awards. The national John Laing Awards were set up in 2004 in honour of John Laing, a former Tasmanian school principal who worked for Principal Australian Institute (then the Australian Principals Association Professional Development Council) in 1993. He was the driving force behind the first cross-sectoral professional learning projects for all principals in Australia and was a pioneer in recognising excellence in educational learning for school leaders. The John Laing Awards are now coordinated by each State principal association to continue to celebrate learning and leadership.
Christ the King Newcombe, from a low socio-economic area in Geelong, embraced a STEM environment with a focus on Lego. The trinity of principals in the Grampians Region of Western Victoria focused on breaking down isolation and the tyranny of distance by embracing the digital world with staff, including shared google drive planning folders for staff meetings, teachers working in individual schools on team planning and collaborating via live video streaming.
Each of the three Catholic schools in Casterton, Coleraine and Edenhope are small rural schools with often only one or two teachers working together. The initiative brings together on a regular basis working, planning and learning together. This team utilized video conferencing technology, shared planning process and a strategy of professional learning communities to bring about change of culture, learning and student outcomes. This work has been celebrated for innovation, diversity in learning and bridging the tyranny of distance in regional Victoria.
In Geelong, the focus was on encouraging young students from a disadvantaged community to take to the world. Christ the King school has recently taken out two international awards at the International First Lego League Competition in Debrecen, Hungary in 2018. These awards included first place for Core Values Teamwork category and the Adult Coach Mentor Award. This international recognition for the school’s work in the area of STEM, specifically Lego Robotics, comes on top of a National Award in Sydney in 2017, taking out the Inspiration Award and a State Award in Melbourne for the Research award in 2016. The principal’s passion for personalising learning and teaching and her belief that students should not be defined by their circumstances has been the driving force behind her vision for Christ the King.
Christ the King 'Cre8te the Future' team (left to right) William Scott, Joshua Walpole, James Sells and Makaira Le calibrating the robot in preparation for the competition. Picture: Alison Wynd Geelong Advertiser.
10 Principles for Schools of Modern Learning
In these times of debate about learning, curriculm and structures of schools, this article gives a fresh perspective from an international perspective.
by Will Richardson and Bruce Dixon
Read the full article by clicking the banner (long read)
The 10 Principles of Modern Schools
1. Have clearly articulated and shared beliefs about learning that are lived in every classroom.
2. Live a mission and a vision deeply informed by new contexts for learning.
3. Have cultures where personal, self-determined learning is at the center of student and teacher work.
4. See curriculum as something that is co-constructed to meet the needs and interests of the child.
5. Embrace and emphasize real-world application and presentation to real audiences as assessment for learning.
6. See transparency and sharing as fundamental to a powerful learning environment.
7. Use technology first and foremost as an amplifier for learning, creating, making, connecting, communicating, collaborating, and problem solving.
8. Develop and communicate in powerful ways new stories of learning, teaching, and modern contexts for schooling.
9. Encourage community wide participation in the equitable, effective education of children.
10. Embrace and anticipate constant change and evolution.
CONGRATULATIONS to Leon Bolding, Principal at St Dominic's School, Innaloo WA...who is our WINNER of a $200 Gift Voucher
Keep up to date with the latest news and updates from ACPPA in 2019.
DOWNLOAD NOW and be ready to receive alerts from next week!
Click this link NOW to find out how!
Thanks for all the entries...enjoy fast and easy access to ACPPA updates from now on!
What’s good ‘evidence-based’ practice for classrooms?
5 min read
We asked the teachers, here’s what they said...
Calls for Australian schools and teachers to engage in ‘evidence-based practice’ have become increasingly loud over the past decade. Like ‘quality’, it’s hard to argue against evidence or the use of evidence in education, but also like ‘quality’, the devil’s in the detail: much depends on what we mean by ‘evidence’, what counts as ‘evidence’, and who gets to say what constitutes good ‘evidence’ of practice.
In this post we want to tell you about the conversations around what ‘evidence’ means when people talk about evidence-based practice in Australian schools, and importantly we want to tell you about our research into what teachers think good evidence is.
Often when people talk about ‘evidence’ in education they are talking about two different types of evidence. The first is the evidence of teacher professional judgment collected and used at classroom level involving things like student feedback and teacher self-assessment. The second is ‘objective’ or clinical evidence collected by tools like system-wide standardised tests.
Evidence of teacher professional judgment
This type of evidence is represented in the Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework. For example, the framework suggests that good evidence of teachers’ practice is rich and complex, requiring that teachers possess and use sharp and well-honed professional judgement. It says: “an important part of effective professional practice is collecting evidence that provides the basis for ongoing feedback, reflection and further development. The complex work of teaching generates a rich and varied range of evidence that can inform meaningful evaluations of practice for both formative and summative purposes” (p.6). It goes on to suggest that sources of this kind of evidence might include observation, student feedback, parent feedback and teacher self-assessment and reflection, among others.
‘Objective’ evidence
The second discussion around evidence promotes good evidence of practice as something that should be ‘objective’ or clinical, something that should be independent of the ‘subjectivity’ of teacher judgement. We see this reflected in, for example, the much lauded “formative assessment tool” announced in the wake of Gonski 2.0 and to be developed by KPMG. The tool will track every child and ‘sound alarms’ if a child is slipping behind. It aims to remedy the purportedly unreliable nature of assessment of student learning that hasn’t been validated by standardising formative assessment practices. Indeed, the Gonski 2.0 report is very strongly imbued with the idea that evidence of learning that relies on teacher professional judgement is in need of being overridden by more objective measures.
But what do teachers themselves think good evidence is?
We’ve been talking to teachers about their understanding and use of evidence, as part of our Teachers, Educational Data and Evidence-informed Practice project. We began with 21 interviews with teachers and school leaders in mid-2018, and have recently run an online questionnaire that gained over 500 responses from primary and secondary teachers around Australia.
Our research shows that teachers clearly think deeply about what constitutes good evidence of their practice. For many of them, the fact that students are engaged in their learning provides the best evidence of good teaching. Teachers were very expansive and articulate about what the indicators of such engagement are:
I know I'm teaching well based on how well my students synthesise their knowledge and readily apply it in different contexts. Also by the quality of their questions they ask me and each other in class. They come prepared to debate. Also when they help each other and are not afraid to take risks. When they send me essays and ideas they might be thinking about. Essentially I know I'm teaching well because the relationship is positive and students can articulate what they're doing, why they're doing it and can also show they understand, by teaching their peers. (Secondary teacher, NSW)
Furthermore, teachers know that ‘assessment’ is not something that stands independent of them – that the very act of using evidence to inform practice involves judgement. Their role in knowing their students, knowing about learning, and assessing and supporting their students to increase their knowledge and understanding is crucial. Balanced and thoughtful assessment of student learning relies on knowledge of how to assess, and of what constitutes good evidence.
Good evidence is gathering a range of pieces of student work to use to arrive at a balanced assessment. I believe I am teaching well when the student data shows learning and good outcomes. (Primary teacher, SA)
Gathering good evidence of teaching and learning is an iterative process, that is it is a process of evaluating and adjusting that teachers constantly repeat and build on. It is part of the very fabric of teaching, and something that good teachers do every day in order to make decisions about what needs to happen next.
I use strategies like exit cards sometimes to find out about content knowledge and also to hear questions from students about what they still need to know/understand. I use questioning strategies in class and make judgements based on the answers or further questions of my students. (Secondary teacher, Vic)
I get immediate feedback each class from my students. I know them well and can see when they are engaged and learning and when I'm having very little effect. (Secondary teacher, Qld)
Where does NAPLAN sit as ‘evidence’ for teachers?
Teachers are not afraid to reflect on and gather evidence of their practice, but too often, calls for ‘evidence-based practice’ in education ignore the evidence that really counts. Narrow definitions of evidence where it is linked to external testing are highly problematic. While external testing is part of the puzzle, it can be harmful to use that evidence for purposes beyond what it can really tell us – as one of us has argued before. And the teachers in our study well understood this. For them, NAPLAN data, for instance, was bottom of the list when it comes to evidence of their practice, as seen in the chart below.
This doesn’t mean they discount the potentially, perhaps partially, informative value in such testing (after all, about 72% think it’s at least a ‘somewhat’ valid and reliable form of evidence), but it does mean that, in their view, the best evidence is that which is tied to the day to day work that goes on in their classrooms.
Teachers value a range of sources of evidence of their practice, placing particular emphasis on that which has a front row seat to their work, their own reflections and observations, and those of the students they teach. Perhaps this is because they need this constant stream of information to enable them to make the thousands of decisions they make about their practice in the course of a day – or an hour, or a minute. The ‘complex work of teaching’ does not need a formalised, ‘objective’ tool to help it along. Instead, we need to properly recognise the complexity of teaching, and the inherent, interwoven necessity of teacher judgement that makes it what it is.
What do teachers want?
Teachers were very clear about what they didn’t want.
Teachers are time poor. We are tired. It sounds good to do all this extra stuff but unless we are given more time it will just be another layer of pressure. (Secondary teacher, NSW)
Teachers believe in and want to rely on useful data but they don't have the time to do it well. (Primary teacher, NSW)
It must be practical, helpful and not EXTRA. (Primary teacher, Vic)
They don’t want “extra stuff” to do.
They want relevant, high quality and localised professional learning. They want to better understand and work with a range of forms of useful data and research. They particularly find in-school teacher research with support useful, along with access to curated readings with classroom value. Social media also features as a useful tool for teachers.
Our research is ongoing. Our next task is to work further with teachers to develop and refine resources to support them in these endeavours.
We believe teachers should be heard more clearly in the conversations about evidence; policy makers and other decision-makers need to listen to teachers. The type of evidence that teachers want and can use should be basic to any plan around ‘evidence-based’ or ‘evidence-informed’ teaching in Australian schools.
Dr Nicole Mockler is Associate Professor of Education, at the Sydney School of Education and Social Work at the University of Sydney. She is a former teacher and school leader, and her research and writing primarily focuses on education policy and politics and teacher professional identity and learning. Her recent scholarly books include Questioning the Language of improvement and reform in education: Reclaiming meaning (Routledge, 2018) and Engaging with student voice in research, education and community: Beyond legitimation and guardianship (Springer 2015), both co-authored with Susan Groundwater-Smith. Nicole is currently Editor in Chief of The Australian Educational Researcher.Nicole is on Twitter @nicolemockler
Dr Meghan Stacey is a lecturer in the sociology of education and education policy in the School of Education at the University of New South Wales. Taking a particular interest in teachers, her research considers how teachers’ work is framed by policy, as well as the effects of such policy for those who work with, within and against it. Meghan completed her PhD with the University of Sydney in 2018. Meghan is on Twitter@meghanrstacey
This article was originally published on EduResearch Matters. Read the original article.
Read LessThe Breakthrough Coach is an educational training and consulting firm that supports school administrators to be transformational leaders who achieve student success in a sensible workweek.
Company president, Malachi Pancoast has been a featured speaker at both the Australian Primary Principals Association's and the New Zealand Principals' Federation's national conferences. Since 2010, the company has also partnered with QASSP, SASSPA, the Government of South Australia Department of Education and Children's Services, and several Australian Catholic diocese school systems to bring their innovative 2-Day Course to Australian school administrators and their secretaries.
For over 20 years, The Breakthrough Coach Program has been foundational for new administrators, and life-altering for experienced ones. With a track record of reducing administrators' workloads by 15-20 hours per week AND multiplying their time in classrooms by 500%, The Breakthrough Coach teaches school leaders how to build productive front-office environments that then free them up to focus on creating sustainable, school-wide improvement.
The Breakthrough Coach is profound - the answer to how to increase student achievement and have a healthy personal life.
School Improvement: Being a new school leader
School Improvement podcast from Teacher magazine with Rebecca Vukovic.
Her guest is someone she originally discovered on Twitter. Craig Heeley is an educator living in Newcastle upon Tyne in northeast England, and this year he landed his first ever Head Teacher role at Lemington Riverside Primary School. Over the past few months, he’s been sharing his experiences in the new Head Teacher role on Twitter, and he’s been mustering up lots of engagement and encouragement from educators around the world that are keen to follow his journey.
ACPPA Exclusive Offer – To Experience Schoolzine
Schoolzine would like to offer all ACPPA schools their trusted Parent Engagement Platform for a 3-month no obligation trial, giving you complimentary access to Schoolzine DIY eNewsletter service.
Special Bonus Offer: If you are happy with the service after the 3-month trial and decide to continue using the DIY newsletter service, you will receive the mobile app (SZapp) for FREE, for the LIFE of your Schoolzine subscription.
Saving your school $599 every year.
Offer expires 29TH of March 2019, to take up this amazing offer simply click on the ACPPA LINKS page to request a no obligation demonstration, or if you have any questions call Schoolzine on 1300 795 503 or CJ on 0433 991 718.
Remember, by using ACPPA LINKS, you are supporting our initiative to assist Catholic Primary Principals in regional and remote areas of Australia to access professional development and events which otherwise may be out of their reach.
Please click on the link to view the case studies from Our Lady of the River in South Australia and St Simon Peter Catholic Primary School in Western Australia.
The benefits of homework may not be immediately apparent
Homework is one of the most significant demands placed on families by school. Homework time is when tensions and arguments are most likely to flare up, and tears to fall. So why bother with homework?
Research has shown that while there is a clear link between homework and achievement in high school, this link is not so clear in primary school. Accordingly, it has been suggested there is no point in homework during primary school, as it has no obvious academic yield.
But this suggestion ignores one of the reasons why homework does little to improve achievement in primary school: younger children are not particularly good at doing homework. To get better, they need practice. It takes time to develop the vital knowledge, skills, and self-direction required to do homework effectively (indeed, we wouldn’t abandon soccer practice in the younger years just because children weren’t scoring goals!).
Leaving homework until high school risks making these capacities harder to attain. Another reason proposed for dropping homework is that it consumes valuable family and leisure time. This is especially upsetting in cases where teachers assign poor-quality homework.
For example, when there is too much of it, it is overly complex or unclear, or it is not obviously targeting important skills or knowledge to develop. However, when teachers assign homework that is time bound, clear, concrete, and relevant, children and families engage with it more constructively. Doing it does not feel like such a time drain.
Homework can be particularly time consuming for struggling students. Indeed, the homework wars are often especially fierce for the strugglers and their families. But it is in these cases that high-quality homework is most important. Alas, some kids do need to spend more time than others to develop the skill and knowledge to hang in there at school.
Whereas some children seem to retain knowledge and skill without a great deal of practice, there are many other “use it or lose it” children who need to keep applying themselves academically to retain what they learn. Reading is a good example: some children really need to keep plugging away at reading or their competence will fade quickly. This requires both support at school and effort at home, including in the form of well-targeted homework.
Finally, in the past decade another reason has emerged to think twice before abandoning homework. In days gone by, when children were not assigned homework (or ignored it), they would play inside or outside, watch television, engage in sports and the like. Today, increasingly, on evenings when children are not doing homework they are deeply and extensively immersed in their mobile technology, such as gaming or social networking. Dependence (and in some cases, addiction) is a risk. This means that when high school arrives and homework becomes essential, not only does the child need to learn good homework habits and skills, they must also wind back a pattern of dependence on mobile technology that is phenomenally difficult to break.
Homework is a burden on families. Homework is not always easy. Homework comes at the cost of other important activities. At the same time, there are good reasons why we should bother with it.
Andrew Martin is Scientia professor and professor of educational psychology in the School of Education at the University of NSW.